Talking about what changes could be made to my program of study sounds quite interesting. The building of the faculty of architecture and urbanism is quite old, a lot of history, so it is understandable that the changes are minimal compared to the other faculties. But, there are facilities that I sincerely find to be a pity the little commitment to innovation and technology for the overall infrastructure. In addition, it is not normal that every winter, with high rainfall, the classrooms are dripping, especially the Titanic building.
I recently found out that they have improved many important details that for years they did not pay attention to.
I just remembered the casino, the famous pigeon casino, for me a nest of pigeons. I find eating at the same table where there are pigeons amusing but dangerous for your health. Clearly this has to be changed, as it has been a problem for years.
Regarding the current curriculum offered by the architecture program, it has improved a lot during these 6 years that it has been in force. So I don't have much to say on that subject.
The workload will always be an issue, the fact of having workshop and theory at the same time is something very agorizing. As for me, I finished the workshops but I hope that the quality and empathy regarding communication with the students will be improved.
Finally, I would really like to be able to go to the field every year and understand architecture on the same scale.

Comentarios
Publicar un comentario